If you despise Google's move of enforcing ad viewing on YouTube by banning adblockers from the Chrome web store and detecting their usage in other browsers (namely Firefox), the solution - for now - might just be Invidious, an alternative frontend for YouTube which does not seem to be affected as of yet. As a piece of open source software, it is decentralized and meant to be self-hosted, but thankfully several public instances are available for people who do not have the technical and/or monetary capacity to host their own.
Once you have selected your instance of choice, though, you might lament the lack of practicality in moving away from the platform which learnt your habits over the years and where, among other things, your subscriptions reside. There is a pretty easy way to get the best of both worlds, though: navigate YouTube as you usually would and just delegate the playing to Invidious by using a bookmarklet which will redirect you from the former to the latter:
If you have multiple frontend apps in a monorepo and want to share code between them to avoid duplication, you are probably better off doing it locally rather than going the whole "setup a private registry, publish a package on it and install it everywhere" route. Fortunately, NPM makes it pretty simple to use a filesystem-based package:
This simple setup is enough... if the module(s) you share do not import anything, which will not get you very far. Let's see how to handle dependencies within the common package!
Your first instinct might be to just install these dependencies through the package's own package.json file, but this might not actually be your best option:
unless you are very thorough with version constraints, you will probably end up with different versions of these dependencies between common and the host app, which might cause trouble down the road
this requires more unnecessary maintenance regarding common itself
if you use React and there is code in common which imports react, your bundle will end up including two copies of it, which will not work at runtime (even if both are the exact same version)
It is far more convenient to just let the host app supply the dependencies, which actually makes sense if we consider modules in common have a fair chance to have originated in one of your apps, and were moved to common once they were needed in another. Since we will not be specifying common's dependencies directly, we need to tell our build tool to explicitly look for dependencies in the app's node_modules directory upon bundling our code. Here is how to do it with Webpack:
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
// ...
resolve: {
modules: [
// ...
"node_modules", // generic "resolve in relative node_modules directory"
path.resolve(__dirname, "node_modules"), // explicitly check the app's node_modules as a backup
],
// ...
},
// ...
};
Note that if you used create-react-app to bootstrap your app, this step is not necessary: the default Webpack configuration seems to have this taken care of.
This should cover it for runtime! Now, if the host app has unit tests for code which imports from common, the same logic applies: we have to let our test runner (this example uses Jest) know that it needs to look for dependencies in the local node_modules:
// You might need this in order to transpile the package's code with Babel before Jest interprets it:
transformIgnorePatterns: ["node_modules/(?!@neemzy/common)"],
// ...
};
Finally, we also need to handle this the other way around: if common has unit tests for modules which import stuff from third-party dependencies, these will also be needed in order for the tests to run; we will therefore tell Jest to fetch dependencies from neighbour apps:
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
// ...
moduleDirectories: [
path.join(__dirname, "../my-app/node_modules"),
// add more of your apps here if needed
],
// ...
};
With all of this, everything should be working as intended, and copied and pasted files now belong in the past!
Update: there is actually one more caveat the above solution does not deal with, which is that when building the app locally in development, devDependencies from the local package might still take precedence over the apps' own dependencies if the former are installed (given npm install actually uses npm link under the hood for local packages), which in turn might cause the same two-copies-of-React-at-runtime issue I described above if those devDependencies happen to bring along React, like @testing-library/react. Since we set up common's unit tests to borrow dependencies from neighbour apps, one ugly but effective solution is to explicitly remove react and react-dom in a postinstall script in common's package.json:
When nesting routes, recent versions of React Router encourage you to declare child routes directly in the component they will render into. Although it is a perfectly valid way of doing things, it gets a bit more complicated if you are defining all your routes in a separate configuration file to begin with. Documentation includes an example of such a config, but it does not cover some pretty essential use cases, such as redirects, or routes using a render function rather than a static component declaration. Let's dive in and see how to do those!
First, let's picture a basic app looking something like the following:
import React from "react";
import { Switch } from "react-router-dom";
import Home from "./components/Home";
import Hello from "./components/Hello";
import World from "./components/World";
Now, imagine we want our World component to actually be rendered within the Hello component, which would better reflect the URL it is accessed at and allow it to share part of its newfound parent's markup, but we want to keep all routes declarations in our config, like so:
To make this work, we need the routes object to be passed down to our Hello component, which we can achieve by superseding the standard Route component:
import React from "react";
import { Route } from "react-router-dom";
import React from "react";
import { Switch, Route } from "react-router-dom";
import RecursiveRoute from "./RecursiveRoute";
export default function Hello({ routes }) {
return (
<div>
<div class="sidebar"><!-- ... --></div>
<Switch>
{Object.entries(routes).map(([key, route]) => <RecursiveRoute key={key}Â {...route} />)}
<Route>I only appear if no child route matched</Route>
</Switch>
</div>
);
}
Routes can now be nested on an infinite number of levels in our config!
So far, we're on par with the example from the React Router docs; but what if instead of showing default content when none of our child routes match, we wanted to redirect to one of them?
In my previous article, I was exploring the possibility to read a Node.js version constraint from the package.json file of every directory upon entering them, and switch Node.js versions accordingly, relying on nvm's default version if a specific one was not required.
The script I hacked together does the job in most cases, but suffers from a few limitations:
it only looks for package.json in the (new) current directory, rather than the closest one in the tree
it is pretty bad at dealing with file ranges, just parsing the first correct version number it could find in them, which turns out to be their lower end
I therefore dug a bit further and found out that n, nvm's main competitor, can perfectly handle those two aspects natively! Just run n auto anywhere and it will look for the closest version constraint in the tree and interpret it correctly, reading from package.json but also from other files - even .nvmrc!
Running it systematically has one major downside, though: n actually reinstalls Node.js upon every version switch, and even if it uses its local cache for versions it has already downloaded, it turns out to be pretty slow; and unfortunately, there does not seem to be an option to cancel the switch if the current version already matches the expected one. Well, in that case, why not write something of our own to do exactly that?
In order to properly handle ranges, we need a list of all available Node.js versions; fortunately, this is pretty easy to get by running n ls-remote --all, the result of which we will store in a file that then gets passed as a parameter to our script.
As I was browsing search results for that exact sentence, I stumbled upon this post which proposes a zsh script automating the switching of Node.js versions when entering a directory using nvm, based on the presence of a .nvmrc file.
It works pretty well, but where I work we already specify Node version constraints in our package.json files (under the engines key) and weren't keen on duplicating that information, since said constraints mostly consist of a strict version anyway. I therefore adapted the original script to read from there instead:
autoload -U add-zsh-hook
switch-node-version() {
if [[ -f package.json ]] && grep -q '"node"' package.json; then
nvm use `cat package.json | sed -nE 's/"node": "[^0-9]*([0-9\.]*)[^"]*"/\1/p'`
elif [[ $(nvm version) != $(nvm version default) ]]; then
nvm use default
fi
}
When using a range (e.g. ^11.9, >=10 <14, etc.), special characters are dropped (which would result in nvm use 10 with the latter example). This brings one caveat, which is that the script doesn't play nice with overly specific ranges, such as ^10.0.0: it would indeed try to nvm use 10.0.0, and that particular version might not be available on one's machine. In such cases, I would advise shortening the range to ^10 (which better conveys the idea anyway in my opinion).